Background Image
Previous Page  101 / 278 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 278 Next Page
Page Background

PRYSMIAN GROUP | DIRECTORS’ REPORT

101

alleged infringement in the period 18 February 1999 - 28 July 2005, for all claims made by the European

Commission in implementation of its decision and for any expenses related to such implementation. The

proceedings have since been stayed by order of the court concerned in April 2015, pending the outcome of

the appeals brought against the European Commission's decision by both Prysmian and Pirelli in the

European Courts. Pirelli has challenged this decision before the Court of Cassation, Italy's highest court of

appeal.

It also noted that the Australian and Spanish antitrust authorities have respectively initiated proceedings to

verify the existence of anti-competitive practices by local cable manufacturers and distributors, including the

Group's foreign subsidiaries based in these countries. As regards the proceedings initiated by the Australian

antitrust authorities, the hearing began at the end of November 2015. The Directors are of the opinion not to

make any provision for the risks arising from these proceedings.

Also in 2015, National Grid and Scottish Power, two British operators, filed claims in the High Court in

London against certain cable manufacturers, including Prysmian Group, to obtain compensation for

damages purportedly suffered as a result of the alleged anti-competitive practices condemned by the

European Commission in the decision adopted in April 2014. The Group companies concerned were notified

of this initial court filing during the month of May 2015 and presented their defence early in October 2015,

along with the summons of other parties censured in the European Commission's decision. Among the

parties involved in this action, Pirelli & C. S.p.A. has requested the London High Court to decline its

jurisdiction or nonetheless to stay the proceedings in its regard pending the outcome of the civil action

previously brought by Pirelli against Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi S.r.l. in the Milan Courts, in which it demands

to be held harmless for all claims made by the European Commission in implementation of the latter's

decision and for any expenses related to such implementation.

As at 31 December 2015, the amount of the provision is approximately Euro 143 million. Despite the

uncertainty of the outcome of the investigations in progress and potential legal action by customers as a

result of the European Commission's decision, the amount of this provision is considered to represent the

best estimate of the liability based on the information now available.

PLANNING AND REPORTING RISKS

Planning and reporting risks are related to the adverse effects that irrelevant, untimely or incorrect

information might have on the Group's strategic, operational and financial decisions. At present, in view of

the reliability and effectiveness of internal procedures for reporting and planning, these risks are not

considered to be relevant for the Group.